US Health Data News
DXC / CMS - DXC books $81M CMS data warehouse support order
DE 8-State - Delaware joins eight-state health care data sharing initiative
GA DPH Grants - Georgia Department Of Public Health Awarded Grants
IBM 100 IT - IBM Announces $100 Million Health IT Program
Governance Key - Governance key to creating effective health data warehouse
Kaiser Apps - Analysis: App-Happy Health Care Full of Optimism Money
UITALD - Interactive Tools to Assess the Likelihood of Death
Michigan DW - Michigan saves $1 million per business day with data warehouse
Digital Health Care - The Digital Health Care Environment
Medicare Use - Feds to allow use of Medicare data to rate doctors hospitals and other health care providers
Most Expensive - 10 Most Expensive Hospitals in the U.S.
NAPHSIS FOD - NAPHSIS Releases New Fact of Death Query Service
Premier-IBM - IBM and the Premier healthcare alliance to integrate nation's healthcare data
SC PHG - S.C. public health group gets $11.25 million grant
TX HHSC #1 - Problem-plagued Texas data project delayed again
TX HHSC #2 - Massive Health Data Warehouse Delayed Again
TX HHSC #3 - Texas HHSC privacy breach may affect 1.8k individuals
UPMC - $100 Million Investment in Sophisticated Data Warehouse and Analytics
Veritas / TR - Veritas to Buy Thomson Reuters Health Care Data Management Line
VT Data Warehouse - Audit Questions Health Information Exchange Oversight in VT
Silver Spring, MD (PRWEB) March 01, 2017
Link to original article
The National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems (NAPHSIS) announced today the release of a new Fact of Death (FOD) Query Service http://www.naphsis.org/evvefod, providing credentialed organizations the ability to quickly, reliably, and securely discover if a death record exists. This service is part of the NAPHSIS Electronic Verification of Vital Events (EVVE) System and is the only service in existence with the ability to match authorized queries against the databases of state or local vital record jurisdictions, where all death records in the nation are stored.
We've been swamped by requests for death data from a variety of industries. Access to complete, timely, and accurate death record data does not currently exist in the United States," says Anthony Stout, manager of EVVE products and services. ?EVVE Fact of Death resolves this problem and can save the country and our customers millions, if not billions, of dollars a year".
Before today, the Social Security Administration (SSA) Death Master File (DMF) https://www.ssa.gov/dataexchange/request_dmf.html was the primary source for death record data. However, its usefulness has been severely hampered since November of 2011, when the SSA was no longer allowed to include state protected death records in the DMF. As a result, millions of death records are missing every year from the DMF, making it woefully incomplete and unusable for many organizations requiring this information to help prevent fraud, protect identities, reduce waste, and streamline business processes.
Currently, there are 37 of 57 states and jurisdictions participating in the EVVE FOD service, allowing credentialed users to match against more than 55 million death records. The number of participating jurisdictions is increasing steadily, and all 57 states and jurisdictions across the nation are working to join the EVVE FOD service as soon as possible.
As death record data includes highly sensitive and personal information, confidentiality and security of such data is of upmost importance. To ensure this service utilizes the highest levels of security possible, NAPHSIS has partnered with LexisNexis® VitalChek Network Inc. (VitalChek) http://vitalcheknetwork.com/ to maintain the EVVE Fact of Death Query Service. VitalChek adheres to all major InfoSec standards such as PCI-DSS, SOC 1, SOC 2, and uses public key / private key encryption technology to ensure incoming requests and outgoing results are secure.
An organization that has a valid need for death record data, and belongs to one of the following current categories, may be credentialed to use EVVE Fact of Death:
Federal-Benefits or Admin State/Local-Benefits or Admin Pension/Retirement Insurance Receivables Financial
Organizations can become credentialed EVVE Fact of Death users by visiting the website at http://www.naphsis.org/evvefod, clicking on the "Get Started Now" link at the bottom of the page and following the prompts. The process is easy, and qualified customers can expect to be using EVVE Fact of Death within a week. There is a minimal per-record price for credentialed private companies and/or government agencies to use the EVVE Fact of Death service. About NAPHSIS: The National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems (NAPHSIS) is the national nonprofit organization representing the state vital records and public health statistics offices in the United States. Formed in 1933, NAPHSIS brings together more than 250 public health professionals from each state, the five territories, New York City, and the District of Columbia. Contact: Anthony N. Stout Manager- EVVE Products and Services 301-563-6005 / evvefod(at)naphsis(dot)org
Audit Questions Health Information Exchange Oversight in VT
Health IT Interoperability
By Kyle Murphy, PhD
October 06, 2016
Link to original article
An audit of health information exchange activities in Vermont has yielded more questions than answers about healthcare interoperability in the state.
Officials at the Department of Vermont Health Access (DVHA) tasked with overseeing the development of a statewide health information exchange have drawn criticism from the state's auditor for their oversight of millions of dollars in grants and contracts. Health information exchange in Vermont In a report released late last month, State Auditor Douglas R. Hoffer found DVHA to have fallen short in two areas: evaluating the actions taken by Vermont Information Technology Leaders, Inc. (VITL) — the exclusive operator of the statewide HIE network — and measuring the latter's performance over the previous two fiscal years, FY 2015 and 2016.
According to the report, the state department issued $12.3 million during that time, representing close to one-third of total funding ($38 million) paid to VITL since 2005. Oversight of the VITL HIE contracts and grants fell to both DVHA and the Agency of Administration (AOA).
Deficiencies in oversight have raised doubts about the development of a clinical data warehouse to be used for health data analysis and reporting.
"Although the State assented to VITL building the warehouse, it was not explicitly included in any agreement as a deliverable, nor did the State define its functional and performance requirements. Without such requirements, the State is not in a position to know whether the clinical data warehouse is functioning as it intends," the report states.
Upon closer inspection, the building of a clinical data warehouse casts doubt on the state's handling of agreements with VITL, which according to the state's audit cited unclear language as authorization for the system.
"Even if we accept that this language authorizes the construction of a clinical data warehouse, which we believe is unclear, no evidence was provided to indicate that the State defined the functional and performance requirements of the warehouse," the report reads. "Without such requirements, the State is not in a position to know whether the clinical data warehouse is functioning as it intends."
Uncertainly also extends to the ownership and use of the clinical data warehouse as a lack of explicit language appears to indicate that the state is the licensee of the software used but its ability to make use of the data is restricted by the healthcare organizations providing the information comprising the system.
"Accordingly, VITL contends that the agreements do not currently permit VITL to disclose the personal health information in the warehouse to the State and, therefore, the State does not have any rights to access, use, or disclose this data," the report states.
As it turns out, the case of the clinical data warehouse was a microcosm of a much larger issue of poor programmatic and financial oversight of VITL. DVHA often failed to finalize agreements with VITL prior to project start dates — in five of six agreements. These delays had several consequences:
First, having VITL perform work without a signed agreement inhibited the State’s ability to hold VITL accountable to desired standards because they had not been formally documented and agreed upon. Second, the Green Mountain Care Board reported that delays in finalizing VITL’s contracts resulted in uncertainty about what terms would ultimately be agreed to or omitted, what work should be prioritized, and if and how to allocate staff, contractors, and other resources to various projects. Third, because of the four-month delay in signing contract #30205, VITL and the State agreed to eliminate two required deliverables (connecting the Cancer Registry and the Vermont Prescription Monitoring System to the VHIE). VITL also reported that the delays in signing other agreements resulted in a reduction in the number of completed activities (e.g., fewer interfaces were developed) and certain projects being completed later than expected (e.g., the event notification system was delayed four months).
State officials chalked up the delays to difficulties in receiving federal approval.
As for measuring DVHA's measuring of VITL's performance over the previous two fiscal years, the State Auditor concluded that agreements "contained few performance measures" to assess quality or impact.
"While DVHA’s agreements with VITL did contain quantity measures (how much), there were very few quality measures (how well), and no impact measures (is anyone better off). Further, the state’s current Vermont Health Information Technology Plan (VHITP) does not specify any performance measures for gauging the performance of the VHIE," the report states.
The state's audit reveals that state officials have taken steps to address these deficiencies, including requiring more detailed invoices from VITL which prompted an investigation into the allowability of some costs (conclusion still pending) and the decision by DVHA to fund an impact assessment of VITL's work
Ultimately, the audit concludes that the states is in no position to determine the functioning of the clinical data warehouse nor measure the performance of VITL in developing HIE services that have a positive impact on improving care quality and reducing care costs.
"Without quantifiable performance measures, the State’s ability to judge VITL’s efforts and gauge success is significantly inhibited," it closed.
Given the uncertainty surrounding health information exchange activities, the state of healthcare interoperability in Vermont remains problematic.
DXC books $81M CMS data warehouse support order
By Ross Wilkers | Dec 20, 2017
Link to original article
DXC Technology has won a one-year, $81.6 million task order with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for enterprise IT services to help operate the main portion of CMS’ data warehouse.
CMS received five offers for the order it awarded via the National Institutes of Health’s $20 billion CIO-SP3 contract vehicle, according to Deltek data.
The company will be responsible for the integrated data repository’s information systems architecture and data models. DXC said in a release it will also carry out extract transform and load, user support, data quality and support functions.
Within the data repository is a Hadoop and Teradata enterprise data warehouse that handles data related to CMS’ program benefits.
Task order work will aim to to ensure that the data and data services provided by the repository for Part A and Part B claims are "payment grade," CMS said in an October 2016 sources sought notice.
CMS defines payment grade as automated validation that the data loaded into the repository is exactly how it was received from the sending source and the installation and enforcement of internal controls to maintain separation of duties.
The agency also determines payment grade based on automated reporting and reconciliation processes in place to confirm the data that was loaded. In most cases CMS expects the reporting to be automated but all reconciliation is manual.
DXC is in the process of separating and merging its U.S. government business into Vencore and KeyPoint Government Solutions to create a new, publicly-traded company.
Delaware joins eight-state health care data sharing initiative
By Nick Ciolino - Jun 25, 2018
Link to original article
Delaware is now part of an initiative to share best practices for collecting and using health care data.
The National Governors Association created the project which also includes Arkansas, Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Vermont and Washington. It seeks to determine the best use for data analytics to inform Medicaid and other state health spending policy.
Dr. Elizabeth Brown is Medical Director of the Delaware Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance. She says state health officials have set up a data warehouse meant to inform Delaware’s decisions as the state moves from a volume-based to a value-based health system and sets a healthcare spending benchmark. She adds this is an opportunity to share what the First State has learned and get input from other states.
We’re going to take a step back look at all of our data systems, look at what best practices are across the country and make sure we are aligning with those best practices,” said Brown.
As a state where the cost of health care is growing faster than its economy, data plays a large role in Delaware’s health spending policy.
But Brown says it’s important to realize the strengths and weaknesses of the data that’s available.
“And that’s actually one of the reasons that projects like this are so important,” she said. “We are analyzing what we can get out of data, what the questions that can be answered accurately and completely with our data are, and where we need to be thinking outside of just the claims data.”
With the support of the NGA, the state health systems will be sharing data techniques with one another over the next 16 months, but will not share the data itself to protect patient privacy.
About 230,000 Delawareans receive Medicaid.
Texas HHSC privacy breach may affect 1.8k individuals
Written by Julie Spitzer | June 20, 2017
Link to original article
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission notified clients after discovering a box containing protected health information outside an unsecured dumpster belonging to a commission eligibility office.
The forms in the box — which included client information of 1,842 people in the Houston area — may have contained information such as names; client numbers; dates of birth; case numbers; phone numbers; mailing addresses; Social Security numbers; health information; and bank account numbers. HHSC is offering those affected by the breach one year of free credit monitoring services, although the agency currently has no evidence that anyone viewed the information, Texas HHSC Assistant Press Officer Kelli Weldon confirmed to Becker's Hospital Review via e-mail.
Ms. Weldon said HHSC is reviewing its processes and procedures for disposing documents that contain private information to prevent this type of incident from occurring in the future.
Massive Health Data Warehouse Delayed Again, A Decade After Texas Pitched It
The Texas Tribune
By Jim Malewitz and Edgar Walters
August 15, 2016
Link to original article
Texas health regulators are starting from scratch in designing a system to store massive amounts of data — after spending millions of dollars trying to roll out a version that’s now been scrapped.
Charles Smith, executive commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, said Monday that his agency had recently nixed a $121 million contract to create an Enterprise Data Warehouse, an enormous database that would store a wide range of information about the many programs the agency administers. First funded in 2007, the project was expected to be up and running a few years after.
Because the original design would not link enough programs at the sprawling agency, regulators would essentially start from scratch on a much larger — and therefore more useful — system, Smith told members of the Texas House State Affairs Committee at a hearing on state contracting reform efforts.
"We were in the process of building a two-bedroom, two-bath home," he said, likening the effort to a home construction project. "You get it ready to prep your foundation, and I realize my spouse is pregnant with quadruplets."
The most recent design, which was largely focused on storing data on Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program "isn’t going to meet the needs of our family," he added.
The update stirred concerns from some lawmakers about the lack of progress on a pricey project with a troubled history.
"Thirty-five million dollars we’ve spent on a project that was supposed to cost $120 million. For that, we have nothing?" asked Rep. Dan Huberty, R-Houston.
"Are we getting back to where we started?" asked Rep. Four Price, R-Amarillo.
Texas has spent $35 million on the project so far, with most coming from federal funds, said Smith, who was appointed to his post in May. About $6 million was tapped from state funds.
Smith did not have an estimate about how much the new, larger project would cost, because those assessments won’t begin until next fall — after the legislative session that begins in January.
He pushed back against suggestions that spending thus far was for naught, noting that the agency — as part of the planning process — had moved to a new software system that would be used in the new data warehouse.
"We’ll go through and develop a plan, and a timeline, and we’ll come back next session with everything we need to obtain through the process," he said.
Since the project was first funded, it has suffered myriad delays, as well as uncertainty about whether the federal government would pitch in with additional funding.
In 2013, the Health and Human Services Commission finally invited private companies to submit proposals for the contract. The next year, state officials chose Truven Health Analytics, a Michigan-based firm, as their tentative winner.
But after a series of contracting scandals at the agency prompted the resignation of several high-ranking officials, the state started over, and in November 2014 asked companies to re-apply for the funding.
Those proposals were due in February 2015, and state officials anticipated the project would begin on Sept. 1 of that year, according to the state’s latest published timeline for the project.
At the time, a spokeswoman for the health commission told the Houston Chronicle that the quality of the project was “more important than the timeline.” The agency nonetheless said it was “still possible” the project would be up and running by the end of 2015.
Smith said his agency needed a warehouse that would give his agency instant access to more data than the scrapped plans accounted for — such as information related to foster care.
"I’m talking to our staff about what is the capacity of our system," he said. "We don’t know how many families are willing and able."
Such concerns come at a time when his agency is growing in size and scope. Three of the state’s five health and human services agencies are consolidating into a single "mega-agency" — a reorganization ordered by state lawmakers in 2015.
The other two agencies, which oversee the state’s foster care system and public health infrastructure, respectively, will be considered for consolidation in 2017. State leaders have said that changing the Health and Human Services Commission’s configuration would streamline services and improve efficiency.
Some lawmakers took heart that Smith had refused to follow through with the warehouse’s original design, calling it a thoughtful approach.
"It sounds like the contract was inadequate," said Rep. Byron Cook, a Corsicana Republican who chairs the State Affairs Committee. "I appreciate that."
Problem-plagued Texas data project delayed again
By Brian M. Rosenthal
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
Link to original article
AUSTIN -- Texas state health officials once again are delaying a massive data project that has struggled to get off of the ground for more than a decade.
The state Health and Human Services Commission informed lawmakers Tuesday it was pausing the "Enterprise Data Warehouse" project, a plan for an elephantine database housing dozens of information sets about everything from welfare benefits to Medicaid.
"HHSC and the other Health and Human Services agencies are going through a transformation process..." the commission explained to the lawmakers. "Therefore, we are reevaluating our long-term data needs and want to ensure the best investment of state resources."
In a separate letter to the company that was set to run the project, the state officials said they would "revisit this necessary project after the transformation process has been substantially completed."
The commission said it was canceling the contractor solicitation process altogether, which means that even if officials decide to restart the project, it will be years before a vendor is chosen.
The decision is the latest twist in a project that has experienced an almost-comical series of setbacks and controversies.
First discussed in 2005, the project was envisioned as a way to improve services and spur savings through better data analysis. Lawmakers funded the project in 2007, calling for it to be operational by February of 2009.
Over the years, state budget writers have set aside more than $100 million for the project -- money that could not be used elsewhere -- and spent more than $12 million, mostly on consultants.
After a slew of delays caused by both the state and federal governments, the health commission thought it finally had gotten the project on track in the spring of 2014, when officials began negotiating a contract with Truven Health Analytics of Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Then came the eruption of a contracting scandal over alleged favoritism by commission officials toward another data company, 21CT of Austin. In a meeting in August of 2014, commission lawyer Jack Stick, who already had steered a Medicaid fraud detection project to 21CT, seemed to imply in a meeting that that company could do the Enterprise Data Warehouse for less money than Truven.
Two weeks later, negotiations with Truven were over. The commission blamed the company's asking price and said there had been a leak that led Truven to learn about Stick's comment.
Stick and four other commission officials eventually resigned in connection with the 21CT scandal, and the Medicaid fraud project was canceled.
The data warehouse project was put out for bid again in November of 2014.
This February, the health commission disclosed that Truven once again had emerged as the winning bidder and would be given a $104 million contract -- nearly $35 million less than what was being discussed in 2014, said the spokesman, Bryan Black.
"The Health and Human Services Commission is excited the contract is signed and we are moving forward," Black said in February.
The fate of the contract may have shifted when former Executive Commissioner Chris Traylor retired last month. His replacement, Charles Smith, opted for the new approach, records show.
International News - Health Data